Matt630
Posts : 23 Join date : 2010-10-15
| Subject: Table Match - incase you haven't seen it Tue Oct 19, 2010 2:29 am | |
| | |
|
Mjolnir
Posts : 2467 Join date : 2010-10-09 Location : London, England
| Subject: Tables Match Tue Oct 19, 2010 5:24 am | |
| Now that's rather nice. In fact, the only thing I don't like about it is that the set up for MVP's "Ballin' Elbow" now seems to take about a fortnight! | |
|
NightStarX Admin
Posts : 1979 Join date : 2010-10-08 Age : 44
| Subject: Re: Table Match - incase you haven't seen it Tue Oct 19, 2010 5:45 am | |
| - Reaper wrote:
- Now that's rather nice. In fact, the only thing I don't like about it is that the set up for MVP's "Ballin' Elbow" now seems to take about a fortnight!
lol, you kiddin'? That was probably my favorite part of the video. That finisher was excellent. Santino's Cobra is similarly awesome. :D | |
|
Mjolnir
Posts : 2467 Join date : 2010-10-09 Location : London, England
| Subject: Finish him Tue Oct 19, 2010 5:56 am | |
| I can just imagine a scenario where its a triple threat cage match, I get one opponent down and accidentally hit the BE, and while its going through the motions, the other opponent climbs the cage and escapes. | |
|
lonewolfshanehunt
Posts : 1225 Join date : 2010-10-09
| Subject: Re: Table Match - incase you haven't seen it Thu Oct 21, 2010 10:16 am | |
| Was SvR10's table match this good? I don't think I ever tried it. | |
|
Mjolnir
Posts : 2467 Join date : 2010-10-09 Location : London, England
| Subject: Table matches Thu Oct 21, 2010 12:08 pm | |
| No, it wasn't that good. You couldn't lean tables on the ropes, there were less moves, and the tables didn't have the same leg break animations. | |
|
lonewolfshanehunt
Posts : 1225 Join date : 2010-10-09
| Subject: Re: Table Match - incase you haven't seen it Thu Oct 21, 2010 2:16 pm | |
| Ah, so this is greatly improved. It looks good. I like how regular moves can break tables, and they don't just slide out of the way when they're not ready to break. | |
|
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Table Match - incase you haven't seen it | |
| |
|